Al-Shabab Terrorism in Kenya: Three Things to Know
Videos
from Video
from Video

Al-Shabab Terrorism in Kenya: Three Things to Know

Al-Shabab’s deadly Westgate Mall siege in Nairobi is unlikely to alter Kenya’s foreign policy, but the incident could encourage tighter U.S.-Kenya relations and reinforce Washington’s engagement with the broader region, says CFR’s Jendayi Frazer.

September 24, 2013 1:03 pm (EST)

Explainer Video

Al-Shabab, an al-Qaeda–linked militant group, has claimed responsibility for the deadly attack and prolonged siege at an upscale mall in Kenya’s capital. CFR’s adjunct senior fellow for Africa studies, Jendayi Frazer, highlights three things to know about the attack and its implications for Kenyan and U.S. policy:

More From Our Experts
  • Al-Shabab’s globalization: The group claiming responsibility for the terrorist attack began as the militant wing of the Somali-based Islamic Courts Union and is affiliated with al-Qaeda in East Africa. It is a global jihadist group with combatants from all over the world, including Pakistan, Afghanistan, and particularly Somalia, says Frazer.

More on:

Kenya

Terrorism and Counterterrorism

  • Kenya’s foreign policy: "The attack on Kenya was partly a response to Kenya’s effort to work with the African Union forces in Somalia to help stabilize the new government," Frazer says. However, Kenya is not going to change its foreign policy and its Western alignment as a result.

More on:

Kenya

Terrorism and Counterterrorism

  • U.S. engagement: "U.S. policy is likely to become even more engaged, even more robust," says Frazer. President Barack Obama spoke with Kenyan president Uhuru Kenyatta following the Westgate mall siege, in what may be the latest sign of overcoming the "awkwardness" between the two nations. Bilateral ties have been distant as Kenyatta faces war crimes charges at the International Criminal Court.

More on:

Kenya

Terrorism and Counterterrorism

More on:

Kenya

Terrorism and Counterterrorism

Close

Top Stories on CFR

Russia

Liana Fix, a fellow for Europe at CFR, and Thomas Graham, a distinguished fellow at CFR, sit down with James M. Lindsay to discuss the future of U.S. policy toward Russia and the risks posed by heightened tensions between two nuclear powers. This episode is the first in a special TPI series on the U.S. 2024 presidential election and is supported by the Carnegie Corporation of New York.

Terrorism and Counterterrorism

Violence around U.S. elections in 2024 could not only destabilize American democracy but also embolden autocrats across the world. Jacob Ware recommends that political leaders take steps to shore up civic trust and remove the opportunity for violence ahead of the 2024 election season.

China

Those seeking to profit from fentanyl and governments seeking to control its supply are locked in a never-ending competition, with each new countermeasure spurring further innovation to circumvent it.